Articles |
Articles PagesAdded May 13 2008Added Apr 28 2008Added Apr 21 2008Added Apr 09 2008Added Apr 04 2008Added Apr 02 2008Added Mar 31 2008Added Mar 20 2008Added Mar 19 2008Added Mar 03 2008Added Feb 27 2008Added Jan 31 2008Added Jan 30 2008Added Jan 16 2008Added Jan 07 2008Added Dec 30 2007Added Dec 15 2007Added Dec 13 2007Added Nov 28 2007Added Nov 20 2007Added Nov 08 2007Added Nov 04 2007Added Oct 27 2007Added Oct 19 2007Added Oct 10 2007Added Oct 07 2007Added Oct 05 2007Added Sep 23 2007Added Sep 21 2007Added Sep 10 2007Added Sep 03 2007Added Sep 01 2007Added Aug 22 2007Added Aug 19 2007Added Aug 17 2007Added Aug 15 2007Added Aug 14 2007Added Aug 08 2007Added Jul 12 2007Added Jul 08 2007Added Jun 29 2007Added Jun 11 2007Added May 30 2007Added May 29 2007Added May 26 2007
Added May 09 2007Added May 02 2007Added May 01 2007Added Apr 29 2007Added Apr 21 2007Added Apr 14 2007Added Apr 11 2007Added Apr 02 2007Added Mar 30 2007Added Mar 25 2007Added Mar 14 2007Added Mar 01 2007Added Feb 28 2007Added Feb 27 2007Added Feb 25 2007Added Feb 08 2007Added Feb 06 2007Added Feb 04 2007Added Jan 12 2007Added Jan 10 2007Added Jan 03 2007Added Dec 31 2006Added Dec 29 2006Added Dec 19 2006
Added Dec 14 2006Added Dec 07 2006Added Dec 05 2006Added Dec 03 2006Added Nov 29 2006Added Nov 27 2006
|
Sylvia Browne and Literary "Borrowing"Phrases in one of Browne's books are identical to those written years earlier by another author.
This 1998 magazine and Browne's 2005 book contain nearly-identical passages. BackgroundI have often wondered just how much of Sylvia Browne's books are actually written by Browne herself. Many of them are co-authored with other authors (Harrison Lindsay and Antoinette May among them). Was Browne a true co-author of these books, or did the others write them, with Browne's name on the cover to make them sell? Even with those books with only Browne's name on the cover, the same question is valid. Did she write them, or were they written by an uncredited author ("ghost-written" - a common occurence with celebrity books)? These questions occur to me not only because of the sheer volume of her books (four in 2006 alone: If You Could see What I See: The Tenets of Novus Spiritus, Exploring the Levels of Creation, Insight: Case Files from the Psychic World and The Mystical Life of Jesus: An Uncommon Perspective on the Life of Christ), but also because the command of the English language shown in the books seems to me to be far superior to the command of the language she demonstrates when speaking in person (an example of which was discussed in this article). Of course, when writing, a person has the luxury of editing and rewrites, which they do not have when speaking off the top of their head, but I would think that the person (or persons) who wrote those books would have a better spoken command of the language than that which Browne exhibits in her personal appearances. Another question which arises when an author produces as much material as Browne has: is it all original, or was some of it "borrowed" from other works? Joe Nickell Speaks UpIn 2005, Browne's book Secrets & Mysteries of the World was published. It contained Browne's "explanations" of all sorts of places, things and phenomena, including the famous "Shroud of Turin," a cloth said by some to be the burial shroud of Jesus of Nazareth. Later that year, an article appeared in Skeptical Inquirer magazine, in which author Joe Nickell showed some rather blatant similarities between Browne's "Shroud" analysis and that which Nickell had made in an article ("Science vs. `Shroud Science'") he had written some seven years earlier, published in the July/August 1998 edition of Skeptical Inquirer. Here are the relevant sections of Browne's and Nickell's text:
Here are those sections again, with color-highlighting to emphasize the "similarities."
AnalysisThis is not just a matter of ideas being the same. In my opinion, there can be no question but that the passage in Browne's book was blatantly copied, almost word-for-word, from Nickell's article. Further, the article was not even credited as a source in Browne's book (this is a frequent criticism of her books - little if any references are ever given). Is this plagiarism? I do not know if it meets the legal definition, but it certainly meets the dictionary definition:
Of course, this makes me wonder what else in that book was "borrowed" without permission from other sources, and passed off as Browne's own original work? And - what about her other books? How much "borrowing" do they contain? ConclusionDoes this have any bearing on whether or not Browne is a "real psychic?" Of course not. But, like her conviction for securities fraud, I think it is evidence of her character, and therefore something which should be taken into account when deciding whether or not she is a person whose word should be trusted. Related LinksClicking on any of these links will load a separate browser window for viewing the linked page. StopSylviaBrowne.com is not responsible for the content of any of these linked pages.
|